Sunday, November 13, 2005

Yet Another Point of Clarification! [Their 'All-Candidates' Meeting (Part II)]

On the front page of his website as at 10:10 pm 05 11 13, Mayor Haime writes: "Leanne Veres was the only one who sent a message expressing regrets."

As a matter of fact, after waiting 6 days for the Lantzville Log Society (the Treasurer of which is the Mayor's wife and candidate for Lantzville councillor, Denise) to select a moderator for me to consider in terms of suitability and capability, I sent, on Thurs., Nov. 10th, the following email to Linda Robinson, the member of the Lantzville Log Society board who had invited me to participate:

First of all, thank you for the invitation to the Candidates' meeting you have arranged for Sat., Nov. 12 at Costin Hall. As you know, I and others have already expressed serious concerns about the lack of impartiality on the part of the majority of the Lantzville Log Society Board, which is sponsoring the event. Also, I have yet to be informed of a moderator being chosen who is acceptable to all potential participants. Our team of candidates, who came together because we share a common concern that the wishes of the majority are not being respected in Lantzville, are out daily knocking on people's doors and hearing their concerns/issues, we have an office in Seaview Plaza where information is posted and people are welcome to drop in when someone is there, we have two internet presences where people can read about the issues and leave their comments, our phone numbers are all listed in the local directory and we are having our third opportunity for residents to meet us at Costin Hall mere hours before your meeting is scheduled, so I feel the public already has ample opportunity to get to know us as individuals, ask us questions and share their views with us. Therefore, once again, thank you for your invitation but I will NOT be attending the meeting the Lantzville Log Society has arranged for this Saturday night at Costin Hall. Based upon this, could you please arrange to cease referring to the meeting as an 'All-Candidates Meeting', in both your signage and any other advertising of the event.

While I technically did not use the word 'regrets' in my reply, I think you will agree that I did respectfully state that I would NOT be attending and I had never said that I would. I have also seen a copy of an email which councillor candidate Mark Wilson sent to Ms. Robinson and in which he says much the same thing and that he also won't be able to be there. You will need to judge for yourselves whether or not I should be held responsible for someone else's decision not to tell the residents of Lantzville this simple fact. Why can't Mr. Haime just be truthful about these things? I note further that I was ultimately only informed of the moderator candidate at 4:10 pm on Friday afternoon, a mere 15 hours before the start of this meeting.
I also think that it is worthy to note, in terms of assessing impartiality of the sponsor, that the previous editor of the Lantzville Log, Lyndon Allbury, was a sitting Trustee of the Lantzville Improvement District, serving with much of the current council.
If you want to 'blame' me for choosing not to attend, please consider that I have formulated my own campaign strategy based on my limited resources of time and money and, above all, I wanted to keep my focus on running a positive campaign. Also, you don't hear me complaining that they're not out meeting residents on their doorsteps, do you?

Sincerely,
Hans J. Larsen
Lantzville councillor candidate

1 Comments:

Blogger Vigilantz said...

Mayor Haime,
Seems we were both arithmetically challenged when we first did our math. Its not the time it takes to make the actual decision, its the decisions which needed to be made on many other campaign issues while we were waiting those 6 days to hear back from the Log Society to see if you had found a moderator from outside of Lantzville (as was advertised for in the News Bulletin).

We haven't been 'attacking' anyone, we have simply been providing information which we think Lantzvillagers need in order to make an informed decision on voting day.

'many' = 5, at least three of whom have been associated with most of your Council, either as councillors or formerly as Trustees.
I am not part of anybody's slate, nor are they part of mine. I am part of a group of individuals who have come together to offer the people an alternative, based on our serious concerns about the state of democracy in Lantzville. Beyond that and, being people who generally didn't know each other before this election, if elected, I expect we will disagree on a number of items and will vigorously debate those differences and actively seek input from residents to arrive at the best solution for all the people of Lantzville.

All I know is that you, as Lantzville's Regional Board Director, voted to extend Nanaimo's Urban Containment Boundary (UCB) to include the Watt Ventures/Jeffs' property, without which this land, which was removed from Lantzville's incorporation boundaries and then offered to Nanaimo, could not have been developed into a shopping centre. Perhaps this explains how you were able to get the six Regional Directors from the City of Nanaimo to support your administration's expanding of Lantzville's UCB from < 2% of the land mass to around 33% - against the strong recommendation of RDN staff to refuse that request.

Now, I'm sorry but I really do have to get back to discussing the important issues with the good people of Lantzville.

16/11/05 14:20  

Post a Comment

<< Home